| Author |
Message |
    
Jo
Advanced Member
Username: Sandog
Post Number: 142
Registered: 07-2006
Rating: N/A
Votes: 0 (Vote!) | | Posted on Tuesday, February 10, 2009 - 10:35 am: | 
|
This may cause problems with XHJK-DT, 28. There goes my soccer matches...
http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/cgi-bin/ws.exe/prod/cdbs/forms/prod/cdbsmenu.hts?contex t=25&appn=101293160&formid=340&fac_num=13058 |
Héctor Servin
Member
Username: Nightwalker
Post Number: 15
Registered: 09-2007
Rating: N/A
Votes: 0 (Vote!) | | Posted on Tuesday, February 10, 2009 - 12:07 pm: |
|
Mmm... that could also mean co-channel interference in higher parts of Tijuana, especially those they have line of sight to the north, northwest because of the 1000 kW ERP. Too bad, isn´t it. |
Jay
Advanced Member
Username: Jay214128
Post Number: 210
Registered: 06-2005
Rating: N/A
Votes: 0 (Vote!) | | Posted on Tuesday, February 10, 2009 - 01:11 pm: |
|
This is good news, as I might still be able to get KCET-DT after the transition. XHJK-DT should relocate to channel 21 or 27 where their analog station is (I forget which one). |
Andy
Advanced Member
Username: Andydrew
Post Number: 322
Registered: 04-2005
Rating: N/A
Votes: 0 (Vote!) | | Posted on Tuesday, March 24, 2009 - 08:39 pm: |
|
We'll see if this causes any issues by the coast in TJ. Currently I am getting great reception of channel 28-1 in Tijuana on UHF 28.
May be OK since KCET-TV is currently transmitting their analog broadcast on UHF 28 at 2450 kW. So the 1000kW that they have applied for for their digital channel is lower.
Transitioning on 6/12/2009 - although only 155kW is current approved for their constuction permit for the digital transmission. |
General over-the-air (OTA)